On this week’s episode, Andrew and Alex start by discussing recent exploit of the Binance chain’s most popular bridge, which led to the theft of nearly $600 million of BNB, the chain’s native token, before the network was paused and much of the theft reversed. Binance chain is more centralized than Ethereum and others, and the swift pause, though effective, was controversial. Some argued that any blockchain that can be paused and reversed is no blockchain at all – just another centralized system. Others argued that the pause was sensible considering the potential loss. After dipping on the news, BNB again traded in line with the market, suggesting investors and holders didn’t penalize them for the decision to pause (and may have even rewarded them for it). The Binance Chain situation exposed a philosophical rift in the industry between “decentralization maxis” who believe decentralization should be put ahead of all other considerations, and “adoption maxis” who believe trade-offs must be made to scale Web3. Who is right? Alex wrote up the discussion for Ninepoint’s weekly newsletter, Digital Asset Digest. Subscribe here: www.digital.ninepoint.com
