This is Episode 8 of PsychCrunch, the podcast from the British Psychological Society's Research Digest, sponsored by Routledge Psychology.
Can we trust psychological studies? We speak to Brian Earp, of Oxford University and Yale University, about how to respond when we're told repeatedly that the veracity of eye-catching findings, or even cherished theories, has come under scrutiny. Brian also talks about his own experience of publishing a failed replication attempt – a must-listen for any researchers who are fearful of publishing their own negative findings. Find Brian on Twitter @BrianDavidEarp
Episode credits: Presented and produced by Christian Jarrett. Mixing and editing Jeff Knowler. PsychCrunch theme music Catherine Loveday and Jeff Knowler. Additional music Legrand Jones (via Pond5). Art work Tim Grimshaw.
Studies discussed:
Assessing the Robustness of Power Posing
See also Dana Carney statement on power posing (pdf) and Amy Cuddy's response.
A Multi-Lab Pre-Registered Replication of the Ego-Depletion Paradigm
A Multilab Direct Replication of Study 1 From Strack, Martin, & Stepper (1988)
Out, damned spot: Can the “Macbeth Effect” be replicated?
Related articles and resources:
Ten Famous Psychology Findings That It’s Been Difficult To Replicate
This is what happened when psychologists tried to replicate 100 previously published findings
All replication efforts covered by us here at the Research Digest
Coverage of the replication crisis by The Psychologist magazine including video of a recent debate on the crisis held by the British Psychological Society.
Commentary pieces by Brian Earp:
What did the OSC replication initiative reveal about the crisis in psychology? An open review of the draft paper entitled "Replication initiatives will not salvage the trustworthiness of psychology" by James C. Coyne
Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology
